JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES

Article

Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences

Year: 2025, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 204-210

Original Article

Formulation and Characterization of the Esomeprazole Microsponge Loaded in-situ Gel

Received Date:25 March 2025, Accepted Date:15 April 2025, Published Date:26 September 2025

Abstract

Background: This study investigates establishing a novel therapeutic approach to treating peptic ulcers that uses an in-situ gel microsponge incorporating esomeprazole. Microsponges carrying esomeprazole magnesium, ethyl cellulose, and Eudragit RS-100 were developed via a quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion technique. Methods: Five formulations were developed and analyzed for entrapment efficiency, drug content, yield, and particle size. Results: From all the five formulations, the F3 formulation showed the maximum results in terms of high drug content (85.24%), entrapment efficacy (85.67 %), particle size (8.36±0.43 µm), and production yield (87.35%). Then the microsponges were incorporated with the Poloxamer 188 to form in-situ gel. The formulation (F3) demonstrated appropriate viscosity (38cps), gelling time (11.95±0.56 sec), and gelling capacity (++). The in-vitro drug release profile revealed that formulation F3 exhibited an extended drug release rate (92.18%). Stability studies indicated minimal changes in particle size (8.36±0.43) and entrapment efficiency (85.67) over three months. Conclusion: This innovative Esomeprazole-loaded microsponge in- situ gel formulation is promising to enhance drug delivery, prolong drug release, and improve patient compliance in peptic ulcer therapy.

Keywords: Microsponge, Esomeprazole, Gastric, Peptic Ulcer, In-situ gel

References

  1. Di Natale MR, Athavale ON, Wang X, Du P, Cheng LK, Liu Z, et al. Functional and anatomical gastric regions and their relations to motility control. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2023;35(9):e14560. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14560
  2. Varghese C, Carson DA, Bhat S, Hayes TCL, Gharibans AA, Andrews CN, et al. Clinical associations of functional dyspepsia with gastric dysrhythmia on electrogastrography: A comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2021;33(12):e14151. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14151
  3. Chen YC, Malfertheiner P, Yu HT, Kuo CL, Chang YY, Meng FT, et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Incidence of Gastric Cancer Between 1980 and 2022. Gastroenterology. 2024;166(4):605–619. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.022
  4. Qin Y, Lao YH, Wang H, Zhang J, Yi K, Chen Z, et al. Combatting Helicobacter pylori with oral nanomedicines. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2021;9(48):9826–9838. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02038b
  5. Das S, Kaur S, Rai VK. Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems: a recent update on clinical pertinence and drug delivery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2021;11(5):1849–1877. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00875-5
  6. An G. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GalNAc-Conjugated siRNAs. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2023;64(1):45–57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.2337
  7. Richter JE, Kahrilas PJ, Johanson J, Maton P, Breiter JR, Hwang C, et al. Esomeprazole Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96(3):656–665. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.3600_b.x
  8. Kidholm K, Jensen LK, Johansson M, Montori VM. Telemedicine and the assessment of clinician time: a scoping review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2024;40(1):e3. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002830
  9. Biharee A, Bhartiya S, Yadav A, Thareja S, Jain AK. Microsponges as Drug Delivery System: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2023;29(13):1026–1045. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230404082743
  10. Rajput D, Rajput D, Masih P. Microsponge Based Drug Delivery System: A Futuristic Approach In Disease Diagnosing And Management. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2022;29(02):284–303. Available from: https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/view/4054
  11. Farhadnejad H, Mortazavi SA, Jamshidfar S, Rakhshani A, Motasadizadeh H, Fatahi Y, et al. Montmorillonite-Famotidine/Chitosan Bio-nanocomposite Hydrogels as a Mucoadhesive/Gastroretentive Drug Delivery System. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2022;21(1):e127035. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-127035
  12. Butola M, Bhatt V, Nainwal N, Jakhmola V, Dobhal K, Ale Y. Preparation and Evaluation of Polymer Fused Metformin Hydrochloride Sustained Release Tablet. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2023;57(3):711–717. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5530/ijper.57.3.86
  13. Shailaja P, Ashok KS. A Promising Oral Drug Delivery System of Microsponges: A Brief Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022;15(9):4319–4324. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.52711/0974-360x.2022.00725
  14. He Y, Majid K, Maqbool M, Hussain T, Yousaf AM, Khan IU, et al. Formulation and characterization of lornoxicam-loaded cellulosic-microsponge gel for possible applications in arthritis. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2020;28(8):994–1003. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.06.021

Copyright

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Published By Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education, Kolar, Karnataka

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.